Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
wen
cf71d3a1c4 Update to 0.02
Upstream changes:
0.02  2013-06-08 21:28:08 CDT
        - qw in list context is now an error
2014-07-13 10:25:54 +00:00
wiz
7eeb51b534 Bump for perl-5.20.0.
Do it for all packages that
* mention perl, or
* have a directory name starting with p5-*, or
* depend on a package starting with p5-
like last time, for 5.18, where this didn't lead to complaints.
Let me know if you have any this time.
2014-05-29 23:35:13 +00:00
wiz
d2ca14a3f1 Bump all packages for perl-5.18, that
a) refer 'perl' in their Makefile, or
b) have a directory name of p5-*, or
c) have any dependency on any p5-* package

Like last time, where this caused no complaints.
2013-05-31 12:39:57 +00:00
asau
e1ab7079b6 Drop superfluous PKG_DESTDIR_SUPPORT, "user-destdir" is default these days. 2012-10-31 11:16:30 +00:00
wiz
8b5d49eb78 Bump all packages that use perl, or depend on a p5-* package, or
are called p5-*.

I hope that's all of them.
2012-10-03 21:53:53 +00:00
obache
39619a9444 Revision bump after updating perl5 to 5.14.1. 2011-08-14 12:26:04 +00:00
seb
c3f1e700ad Bump the PKGREVISION for all packages which depend directly on perl,
to trigger/signal a rebuild for the transition 5.10.1 -> 5.12.1.

The list of packages is computed by finding all packages which end
up having either of PERL5_USE_PACKLIST, BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS.perl,
or PERL5_PACKLIST defined in their make setup (tested via
"make show-vars VARNAMES=..."), minus the packages updated after
the perl package update.

sno@ was right after all, obache@ kindly asked and he@ led the
way. Thanks!
2010-08-21 16:32:42 +00:00
sno
15707ea5a1 Bumping revision of packages which depend direct or indirect on
devel/p5-Class-MOP. A late detected incompible change forced it.
2009-09-24 06:50:10 +00:00
sno
f02ce5c398 Importing devel/p5-MooseX-MultiInitArg version 0.01 as dependency of
scheduled update of net/p5-Net-Twitter to 3.05003.

The author describes his module:
If you've ever wanted to be able to call an attribute any number of things
while you're passing arguments to your object constructor, Now You Can.

The primary motivator is that I have some attributes that were named
inconsistently, and I wanted to rename them without breaking backwards
compatibility with my existing API.
2009-09-16 19:22:18 +00:00