Commit graph

12 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
dholland
cefd070d1f add comment about emacs version, suggested by wiz 2014-01-02 04:56:13 +00:00
dholland
0c23185f8f At some point the emacs in here got changed to emacs24 without
discussion; set it back to emacs22, which was chosen on purpose.

emacs24 takes longer to build than the entire intended time budget for
this package.

Bump version.
2014-01-01 22:52:14 +00:00
dholland
daff0fa285 fvwm no longer requires xpmroot, so remove xpmroot. 2013-12-22 15:29:20 +00:00
jperkin
769cb4e20c x11-links should only be used with X11_TYPE == native. 2013-12-12 13:27:17 +00:00
wiz
d2ca14a3f1 Bump all packages for perl-5.18, that
a) refer 'perl' in their Makefile, or
b) have a directory name of p5-*, or
c) have any dependency on any p5-* package

Like last time, where this caused no complaints.
2013-05-31 12:39:57 +00:00
dholland
3ce2e2a3d6 ghostscript -> ghostscript-gpl 2013-03-16 22:58:52 +00:00
obache
00dea84d0b meta-pkgs/bulk-* are just for build test purpose:
* change dependeny on listed packages from full to build
* prevent to provide binary pakcage
2013-02-23 02:53:58 +00:00
jperkin
0995984d83 Fix pbulk resolution failures with emacs packages. 2013-02-18 09:27:19 +00:00
dholland
522063d466 Update emacs depends. (oops) 2013-02-17 18:41:11 +00:00
dholland
c7f7a9b418 Add icewm per tech-pkg. 2013-01-20 21:47:28 +00:00
dholland
fe3d2496bf There are altogether too many packages whose PKGNAME and PKGDIR don't
match.

These now pbulk-scan properly.
2013-01-17 06:05:31 +00:00
dholland
dcf36891b8 Add three meta-packages, bulk-small, bulk-medium, and bulk-large.
These are lists of packages that can be used to do restricted bulk
builds on small/slow machines without having to spend time researching
which packages to include.

They are supposed to take roughly 1 hour, 8 hours, and 24 hours on the
arbitrarily chosen yardstick of my build machine; my hope is that this
translates into only moderately crazy lengths of time for slow
platforms where a full bulk build takes 6-8 months.

The lists will doubtless need some adjustment to meet this time
budget. Also, please take any discussion of which packages are and are
not included to tech-pkg or pkgsrc-users. The intent is to provide a
maximally useful set of a given size, but that's naturally difficult
to define.
2013-01-17 03:51:05 +00:00