- Add following line
PERL5_MODULE_TYPE= Module::Build
(upstream)
- Update 1.05 to 1.06
-------------------
1.06 2015-02-11
- Fixed some typos. RT 88523.
- Changed ChangeLog file to new Changes specification.
- Documentation improvments
- Put distro on GitHub. Gabor Szabo
- Fixed Module::Build requirement. RT 102059.
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=102059
Test::Inter has an requirement for Module::Build of 0.39, yet
it builds just fine with Module::Build 0.280801. Please reduce
the Module::Build version requirement
Do it for all packages that
* mention perl, or
* have a directory name starting with p5-*, or
* depend on a package starting with p5-
like last time, for 5.18, where this didn't lead to complaints.
Let me know if you have any this time.
Upstream changes:
Version 1.04 2013-03-18
The __nl__ substitution wasn't happening.
Version 1.05 2013-03-20
Fixed the Build.PL/Makefile.PL scripts to not install the example scripts. RT 84091
a) refer 'perl' in their Makefile, or
b) have a directory name of p5-*, or
c) have any dependency on any p5-* package
Like last time, where this caused no complaints.
Changes from previous:
Version 1.02 2011-06-23
Added 'width' method.
Updated some tests which did not run correctly with perl 5.015. Renee Baecker
Version 1.03 2011-06-28
Missed one of the tests that fail with perl 5.015.
to trigger/signal a rebuild for the transition 5.10.1 -> 5.12.1.
The list of packages is computed by finding all packages which end
up having either of PERL5_USE_PACKLIST, BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS.perl,
or PERL5_PACKLIST defined in their make setup (tested via
"make show-vars VARNAMES=..."), minus the packages updated after
the perl package update.
sno@ was right after all, obache@ kindly asked and he@ led the
way. Thanks!
This is another framework for writing test scripts. It is loosely
inspired by Test::More, and has most of it's functionality, but it
is not a drop-in replacement.
Test::More (and other existing test frameworks) suffer from two weaknesses:
None offer the ability to access specific tests in a reasonably
interactive fashion
None offer the ability to write the tests in whatever format
would make the tests the most readable
