Commit graph

15 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
wen
2a09e79b41 Update to 2.02
Upstream changes:
2.02 - Tue Aug 26 13:01:43 2014
	Fix rt.cpan.org #98288: fix a spelling mistake

2.00_001 - Thu Jul 11 20:22:40 2013
	* Switch back to Makefile.PL much simpler

2.00_01 - Wed Jul 20 01:02:11 2011
	* Work with Module::Build by supplying a subclass.
2014-09-04 07:53:39 +00:00
wiz
7eeb51b534 Bump for perl-5.20.0.
Do it for all packages that
* mention perl, or
* have a directory name starting with p5-*, or
* depend on a package starting with p5-
like last time, for 5.18, where this didn't lead to complaints.
Let me know if you have any this time.
2014-05-29 23:35:13 +00:00
wiz
d2ca14a3f1 Bump all packages for perl-5.18, that
a) refer 'perl' in their Makefile, or
b) have a directory name of p5-*, or
c) have any dependency on any p5-* package

Like last time, where this caused no complaints.
2013-05-31 12:39:57 +00:00
asau
e1ab7079b6 Drop superfluous PKG_DESTDIR_SUPPORT, "user-destdir" is default these days. 2012-10-31 11:16:30 +00:00
wiz
8b5d49eb78 Bump all packages that use perl, or depend on a p5-* package, or
are called p5-*.

I hope that's all of them.
2012-10-03 21:53:53 +00:00
obache
39619a9444 Revision bump after updating perl5 to 5.14.1. 2011-08-14 12:26:04 +00:00
seb
c3f1e700ad Bump the PKGREVISION for all packages which depend directly on perl,
to trigger/signal a rebuild for the transition 5.10.1 -> 5.12.1.

The list of packages is computed by finding all packages which end
up having either of PERL5_USE_PACKLIST, BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS.perl,
or PERL5_PACKLIST defined in their make setup (tested via
"make show-vars VARNAMES=..."), minus the packages updated after
the perl package update.

sno@ was right after all, obache@ kindly asked and he@ led the
way. Thanks!
2010-08-21 16:32:42 +00:00
sno
87c7294520 Updating package for p5 module Test::Manifest from 1.22nb1 to 1.23
pkgsrc changes:
  - Adding license (perl5 license)

Upstream changes:
1.23 - Fri Jul 17 03:04:38 2009
	* Move everything to git and finally make a release

1.22_03 - Tue Jul 29 21:14:49 2008
	* Fixed bug for missing file: previously the missing file
	name was passed through to run_t_files, although without
	the t/ added to its path. Test::Manifest should only
	warn about and skip missing files.

1.22_02 - Thu Jan 24 06:13:13 2008
	* File path and unlink fixes for VMS (RT #32061). Let's see if this works.

1.22_01 - Sun Jan  6 14:18:46 2008
	* Changed test file names to only have one dot in them so they
	work on VMS and ODS-2 file systems: RT #32061
	* This is a test release.
2009-07-30 07:26:57 +00:00
he
b021813da0 Bump the PKGREVISION for all packages which depend directly on perl,
to trigger/signal a rebuild for the transition 5.8.8 -> 5.10.0.

The list of packages is computed by finding all packages which end
up having either of PERL5_USE_PACKLIST, BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS.perl,
or PERL5_PACKLIST defined in their make setup (tested via
"make show-vars VARNAMES=...").
2008-10-19 19:17:40 +00:00
joerg
ba171a91fa Add DESTDIR support. 2008-06-12 02:14:13 +00:00
wiz
0bd09584e9 Update to 1.22:
1.22 - Sat Oct 27 21:24:10 2007
	* distro cleanups after moving from CVS to SVN

1.21 - Wed Sep 19 19:45:27 2007
	* [BUGFIX] getting rid of Test::More
2007-11-29 15:09:39 +00:00
jlam
56ba4d2690 Remove empty PLISTs from pkgsrc since revision 1.33 of plist/plist.mk
can handle packages having no PLIST files.
2007-10-25 16:54:26 +00:00
wiz
2837a688c2 Update to 1.17:
1.17 - Thu Feb 22 13:20:23 2007
	* Updated to Sourceforge's SVN repository
	* Dist conforms to META 1.2 spec
	* No feature changes, so no big hurry to upgrade

1.16 - Tue Aug 29 17:43:16 2006
	* Added an experimental feature to grab file names from additional
	files. Just specify which other files to grab file names from:

	;include names_in_this_file.txt

	See the docs for get_t_files().

	* This is an experimental feature. This feature is experimental.
2007-02-27 12:58:18 +00:00
jlam
9c8b5ede43 Point MAINTAINER to pkgsrc-users@NetBSD.org in the case where no
developer is officially maintaining the package.

The rationale for changing this from "tech-pkg" to "pkgsrc-users" is
that it implies that any user can try to maintain the package (by
submitting patches to the mailing list).  Since the folks most likely
to care about the package are the folks that want to use it or are
already using it, this would leverage the energy of users who aren't
developers.
2006-03-04 21:28:51 +00:00
wiz
327521e18f Initial import of p5-Test-Manifest:
Choose order of the test cases, not necessarily alphabetical,
as usual.
2005-11-23 21:59:00 +00:00