c27f4ed5e1
It is more consistent with the tex.buildlink3.mk name. Also, if a package really needs latex, it just has to set TEX_ACCEPTED to latex distributions altough today, all TEX_ACCEPTED possibilities are latex distributions
26 lines
572 B
Makefile
26 lines
572 B
Makefile
# $NetBSD: Makefile,v 1.40 2005/11/11 18:50:25 tonio Exp $
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
DISTNAME= teTeX-2.0.2
|
|
PKGREVISION= 1
|
|
CATEGORIES= print meta-pkgs
|
|
MASTER_SITES= # empty
|
|
DISTFILES= # empty
|
|
|
|
MAINTAINER= kei@NetBSD.org
|
|
HOMEPAGE= http://www.tug.org/tetex/
|
|
COMMENT= Thomas Esser's TeX distribution for UNIX compatible systems, version 2
|
|
|
|
DEPENDS+= texi2html>=1.52:../../textproc/texi2html
|
|
|
|
CONFLICTS+= teTeX2-[0-9]*
|
|
|
|
EXTRACT_ONLY= # empty
|
|
NO_CHECKSUM= yes
|
|
NO_CONFIGURE= yes
|
|
NO_BUILD= yes
|
|
|
|
do-install: # do nothing
|
|
|
|
.include "../../mk/tex.buildlink3.mk"
|
|
.include "../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk"
|