pkgsrc/lang/python34/patches/patch-Lib_distutils_unixccompiler.py
joerg 5ad5ab599e A few years ago, a brilliant mind decided to hard-code DT_RUNPATH for
all platforms that use GNU ld. This is of course completely wrong. Some
platforms have always implemented the sane semantic for DT_RPATH already
and newer saw a reason for implementing the then-redundant DT_RUNPATH.
Unbreak them by trusting the compiler to actually know what the platform
default should be. Bump revision.
2016-02-23 15:07:36 +00:00

31 lines
1.4 KiB
Python

$NetBSD: patch-Lib_distutils_unixccompiler.py,v 1.2 2016/02/23 15:07:36 joerg Exp $
Do not force RUNPATH vs RPATH, trust the compiler to know what the
platform wants.
--- Lib/distutils/unixccompiler.py.orig 2013-05-15 16:32:54.000000000 +0000
+++ Lib/distutils/unixccompiler.py
@@ -232,22 +232,7 @@ class UnixCCompiler(CCompiler):
elif sys.platform[:7] == "irix646" or sys.platform[:6] == "osf1V5":
return ["-rpath", dir]
else:
- if self._is_gcc(compiler):
- # gcc on non-GNU systems does not need -Wl, but can
- # use it anyway. Since distutils has always passed in
- # -Wl whenever gcc was used in the past it is probably
- # safest to keep doing so.
- if sysconfig.get_config_var("GNULD") == "yes":
- # GNU ld needs an extra option to get a RUNPATH
- # instead of just an RPATH.
- return "-Wl,--enable-new-dtags,-R" + dir
- else:
- return "-Wl,-R" + dir
- else:
- # No idea how --enable-new-dtags would be passed on to
- # ld if this system was using GNU ld. Don't know if a
- # system like this even exists.
- return "-R" + dir
+ return "-Wl,-R" + dir
def library_option(self, lib):
return "-l" + lib