jlam a9f08159c4 Back out last change related to moving ncurses/buildlink2.mk to ... curses.buildlink2.mk. This was wrong because we _really_ do want to express that we want _n_curses when we include the buildlink2.mk file. We should have a better way to say that the NetBSD curses doesn't quite work well enough. In fact, it's far better to depend on ncurses by default, and exceptionally note when it's okay to use NetBSD curses for specific packages. We will look into this again in the future.		2003-09-28 09:13:55 +00:00
..
patches	Add NetBSD RCS tags	2003-06-13 10:55:25 +00:00
DEINSTALL	* buildlink1 -> buildlink2	2002-10-08 11:50:04 +00:00
DESCR	Simplify the description.	2002-10-08 11:46:21 +00:00
distinfo	Make cda build with either curses or ncurses by putting a conditional	2003-06-10 20:45:35 +00:00
INSTALL	* buildlink1 -> buildlink2	2002-10-08 11:50:04 +00:00
Makefile	Back out last change related to moving ncurses/buildlink2.mk to	2003-09-28 09:13:55 +00:00
MESSAGE	* buildlink1 -> buildlink2	2002-10-08 11:50:04 +00:00
PLIST	* buildlink1 -> buildlink2	2002-10-08 11:50:04 +00:00