6d2427cc41
discussion. We don't need it yet and we may not need it at all. Also remove pseudo-helpful commentary. Users can interpret licenses (or lack thereof) just fine themselves. Thanks to gdt@ for being very careful about this stuff.
15 lines
512 B
Text
15 lines
512 B
Text
$NetBSD: djb-nonlicense,v 1.3 2006/05/05 21:23:35 schmonz Exp $
|
|
|
|
Many software packages written by Dan Bernstein do not have licenses.
|
|
Therefore, such software (trivially) does not have a license approved
|
|
as Free or Open Source.
|
|
|
|
Bernstein's rationale for not placing his software under a license is
|
|
described at "Software user's rights":
|
|
|
|
http://cr.yp.to/softwarelaw.html
|
|
|
|
Bernstein's redistribution conditions are described at "Frequently
|
|
asked questions from distributors":
|
|
|
|
http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html
|