Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Patrick Ohly
169adb3d91 shared layout: fix for showing and setting "type" property (MB #9939)
The "type" property is special because it must be set in the per-peer
config node (backend and data format) and in the shared config node
(only backend relevant).

The MultiplexConfigNode picks the right node, but that was based on
the (invalid) assumption that the peer nodes would be NULL when not in
use. What really happens is that dummy instances are used, to allow
writing into these nodes. Because of this false assumption, the "type"
for the context was always printed as the default "select backend".
Fixed by telling the MultiplexConfigNode that its peer nodes are
dummies.

In addition, setting the "type" property for a context didn't work
because copyProperties() treated "type" as a per-peer property which
had to be skipped. Fixed by teaching it about the special case.

The D-Bus and Cmdline tests were extended to cover these cases. They
failed (as expected) before fixing the implementation.
2010-03-03 12:01:12 +01:00
Patrick Ohly
b4435ce13b config: share properties between peers, configuration view without peer
This patch makes the configuration layout with per-source and per-peer
properties the default for new configurations. Migrating old
configurations is not implemented. The command line has not
been updated at all (MB #8048). The D-Bus API is fairly complete,
only listing sessions independently of a peer is missing (MB #8049).

The key concept of this patch is that a pseudo-node implemented by
MultiplexConfigNode provides a view on all user-visible or hidden
properties. Based on the property name, it looks up the property
definition, picks one of the underlying nodes based on the property
visibility and sharing attributes, then reads and writes the property
via that node. Clearing properties is not needed and not implemented,
because of the uncertain semantic (really remove shared properties?!).

The "sync" property must be available both in the per-source config
(to pick a backend independently of a specific peer) and in the
per-peer configuration (to select a specific data format). This is
solved by making the property special (SHARED_AND_UNSHARED flag) and
then writing it into two nodes. Reading is done from the more specific
per-peer node, with the other node acting as fallback.

The MultiplexConfigNode has to implement the FilterConfigNode API
because it is used as one by the code which sets passwords in the
filter. For this to work, the base FilterConfigNode implementation must
use virtual method calls.

The TestDBusSessionConfig.testUpdateConfigError checks that the error
generated for an incorrect "sync" property contains the path of the
config.ini file. The meaning of the error message in this case is that
the wrong value is *for* that file, not that the property is already
wrong *in* the file, but that's okay.

The MultiplexConfigNode::getName() can only return a fixed name. To
satisfy the test and because it is the right choice at the moment for
all properties which might trigger such an error, it now is configured
so that it returns the most specific path of the non-shared
properties.

"syncevolution --print-config" shows errors that are in files. Wrong
command line parameters are rejected with a message that refers to the
command line parameter ("--source-property sync=foo").
A future enhancement would be to make the name depend on the
property (MB#8037).

Because an empty string is now a valid configuration name (referencing
the source properties without the per-peer properties) several checks
for such empty strings were removed. The corresponding tests were
updated resp. removed. Instead of talking about "server not found",
the more neutral name "configuration" is used. The new
TestMultipleConfigs.testSharing() covers the semantic of sharing
properties between multiple configs.

Access to non-existant nodes is routed into the new
DevNullConfigNode.  It always returns an empty string when reading and
throws an error when trying to write into it. Unintentionally writing
into a config.ini file therefore became harder, compared with the
previous instantiation of SyncContext() with empty config name.

The parsing of incoming messages uses a SyncContext which is bound to
a VolatileConfigNode. This allows reading and writing of properties
without any risk of touching files on disk.

The patch which introduced the new config nodes was not complete yet
with regards to the new layout. Removing nodes and trees used the
wrong root path: getRootPath() refers to the most specific peer
config, m_root to the part without the peer path. SyncConfig must
distinguish between a view with peer-specific properties and one
without, which is done by setting the m_peerPath only if a peer was
selected. Copying properties must know whether writing per-specific
properties ("unshared") is wanted, because trying to do it for a view
without those properties would trigger the DevNullConfigNode
exception.

SyncConfig::removeSyncSource() removes source properties both in the
shared part of the config and in *all* peers. This is used by
Session.SetConfig() for the case that the caller is a) setting instead
of updating the config and b) not providing any properties for the
source. This is clearly a risky operation which should not be done
when there are other peers which still use the source. We might have a
problem in our D-Bus API definition for "removing a peer
configuration" (MB #8059) because it always has an effect on other
peers.

The property registries were initialized implicitly before. With the
recent changes it happened that SyncContext was initialized to analyze
a SyncML message without initializing the registry, which caused
getRemoteDevID() to use a property where the hidden flag had not been
set yet.

Moving all of these additional flags into the property constructors is
awkward (which is why they are in the getRegistry() methods), so this
was fixed by initializing the properties in the SyncConfig
constructors by asking for the registries. Because there is no way to
access them except via the registry and SyncConfig instances (*), this
should ensure that the properties are valid when used.

(*) Exception are some properties which are declared publicly to have access
to their name. Nobody's perfect...
2009-11-25 16:57:50 +01:00