mirror of
https://github.com/oxen-io/oxen-core.git
synced 2023-12-14 02:22:56 +01:00
dns: make ctor private
This ensures one can't instanciate a DNSResolver object by mistake, but uses the singleton. A separate create static function is added for cases where a new object is explicitely needed.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a1af0feb06
commit
5990344cb0
3 changed files with 21 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -334,6 +334,11 @@ DNSResolver& DNSResolver::instance()
|
|||
return *staticInstance;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DNSResolver DNSResolver::create()
|
||||
{
|
||||
return DNSResolver();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool DNSResolver::check_address_syntax(const char *addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// if string doesn't contain a dot, we won't consider it a url for now.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct DNSResolverData;
|
|||
*/
|
||||
class DNSResolver
|
||||
{
|
||||
public:
|
||||
private:
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @brief Constructs an instance of DNSResolver
|
||||
|
@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ public:
|
|||
*/
|
||||
DNSResolver();
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @brief takes care of freeing C pointers and such
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -119,6 +121,13 @@ public:
|
|||
*/
|
||||
static DNSResolver& instance();
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @brief Gets a new instance of DNSResolver
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return returns a pointer to the new object
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static DNSResolver create();
|
||||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
TEST(DNSResolver, IPv4Success)
|
||||
{
|
||||
tools::DNSResolver resolver;
|
||||
tools::DNSResolver resolver = tools::DNSResolver::create();
|
||||
|
||||
bool avail, valid;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ TEST(DNSResolver, IPv4Success)
|
|||
TEST(DNSResolver, IPv4Failure)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// guaranteed by IANA/ICANN/RFC to be invalid
|
||||
tools::DNSResolver resolver;
|
||||
tools::DNSResolver resolver = tools::DNSResolver::create();
|
||||
|
||||
bool avail, valid;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ TEST(DNSResolver, IPv4Failure)
|
|||
|
||||
TEST(DNSResolver, DNSSECSuccess)
|
||||
{
|
||||
tools::DNSResolver resolver;
|
||||
tools::DNSResolver resolver = tools::DNSResolver::create();
|
||||
|
||||
bool avail, valid;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ TEST(DNSResolver, DNSSECSuccess)
|
|||
|
||||
TEST(DNSResolver, DNSSECFailure)
|
||||
{
|
||||
tools::DNSResolver resolver;
|
||||
tools::DNSResolver resolver = tools::DNSResolver::create();
|
||||
|
||||
bool avail, valid;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ TEST(DNSResolver, DNSSECFailure)
|
|||
// It would be great to include an IPv6 test and assume it'll pass, but not every ISP / resolver plays nicely with IPv6;)
|
||||
/*TEST(DNSResolver, IPv6Success)
|
||||
{
|
||||
tools::DNSResolver resolver;
|
||||
tools::DNSResolver resolver = tools::DNSResolver::create();
|
||||
|
||||
bool avail, valid;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ TEST(DNSResolver, DNSSECFailure)
|
|||
TEST(DNSResolver, IPv6Failure)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// guaranteed by IANA/ICANN/RFC to be invalid
|
||||
tools::DNSResolver resolver;
|
||||
tools::DNSResolver resolver = tools::DNSResolver::create();
|
||||
|
||||
bool avail, valid;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue