Fixed a build issue

This commit is contained in:
Morgan Pretty 2023-04-26 11:57:30 +10:00
parent 8cf2cef050
commit 56164ab7f4
1 changed files with 9 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ class ThreadDisappearingMessagesSettingsViewModel: SessionTableViewModel<ThreadD
/// this is due to the behaviour of `ValueConcurrentObserver.asyncStartObservation` which triggers it's own
/// fetch (after the ones in `ValueConcurrentObserver.asyncStart`/`ValueConcurrentObserver.syncStart`)
/// just in case the database has changed between the two reads - unfortunately it doesn't look like there is a way to prevent this
private lazy var _observableSettingsData: ObservableData = ValueObservation
private lazy var _observableTableData: ObservableData = ValueObservation
.trackingConstantRegion { [weak self, config, dependencies, threadId = self.threadId] db -> [SectionModel] in
let userPublicKey: String = getUserHexEncodedPublicKey(db, dependencies: dependencies)
let maybeThreadViewModel: SessionThreadViewModel? = try SessionThreadViewModel
@ -115,7 +115,10 @@ class ThreadDisappearingMessagesSettingsViewModel: SessionTableViewModel<ThreadD
isSelected: { (self?.currentSelection.value == 0) }
),
isEnabled: (
maybeThreadViewModel?.threadVariant != .closedGroup ||
(
maybeThreadViewModel?.threadVariant != .legacyGroup &&
maybeThreadViewModel?.threadVariant != .group
) ||
maybeThreadViewModel?.currentUserIsClosedGroupMember == true
),
onTap: { self?.currentSelection.send(0) }
@ -132,7 +135,10 @@ class ThreadDisappearingMessagesSettingsViewModel: SessionTableViewModel<ThreadD
isSelected: { (self?.currentSelection.value == duration) }
),
isEnabled: (
maybeThreadViewModel?.threadVariant != .closedGroup ||
(
maybeThreadViewModel?.threadVariant != .legacyGroup &&
maybeThreadViewModel?.threadVariant != .group
) ||
maybeThreadViewModel?.currentUserIsClosedGroupMember == true
),
onTap: { self?.currentSelection.send(duration) }