no-issue
This is because the Content API will eventually be accessed not just
from Content API keys. The addition of a Content API specific
authorization middleware is because:
1. content api should not authorize based on req.user
2. content api will need separate authorization than admin api
* Added API Key auth middleware to v2 content API
refs #9865
- add `auth.authenticate.authenticateContentApiKey` middleware
- accepts `?key=` query param, sets `req.api_key` if it's a known Content API key
- add `requiresAuthorizedUserOrApiKey` authorization middleware
- passes if either `req.user` or `req.api_key` exists
- update `authenticatePublic` middleware stack for v2 content routes
* Fixed functional content api tests
no-issue
This fixes the functional content api tests so they use the content api
auth.
* Fixed context check and removed skip
* Updated cors middleware for content api
* Removed client_id from frame.context
no-issue
The v2 api doesn't have a notion of clients as we do not use oauth for it
* Fixed tests for posts input serializer
* Added admin specific auth{enticate,orize} middleware
refs #9865
This middleware will be used by the admin api to authenticate and
authorize requests
* Update v2/admin to use authAdminApi middleware
refs #9865
This changes thh auth middleware to use the adminApi authenticate and
authorize middlewares underneath, it also renames the middleware to be
consistent with the naming of the api.
* Removed oauth specific endpoints from /v2/admin
refs #9865
These are not to be used in v2/admin
* Wired up the session controller to the admin api
refs #9865
These endpoints will be used by ghost admin to login, confirm logged in status and logout
Aileen Nowak
Grant
kirrg001
Kevin Ansfield
Fabien O'Carroll