no-issue
The permissions module is no longer necessary as we only suppot internal
apps, which have all permissions. This allowed us to delete the module,
but required that we update the loader to remove references to it.
no issue
- the `{active,installed}_apps` settings related to a very old, minimally implemented, unreleased, and problematic approach to custom apps
- this is the first step towards full removal of the old "apps" concept
Credits: Kacper Szurek
no issue
- Added new API to delete members
- Added methods to handle e2e member deletion
- Deleting member via Admin leads to
- Removal of member from payment processor and cancelling all active subscriptions immediately
- Removal of member information from DB
closes#10640
- Updated sitemap resources data to include certain fields
- Fixes sitemap date and images value
- Updated date handling for sitemap nodes
no issue
- the conditional for removal of trailing blank paragraphs was not sufficient to handle paragraphs where the first child element was not a text node such as when the content of the last paragraph is italic
- switched to a method that fully walks the DOM of the last paragraph node to extract its equivalent `.textContent` value for use in the "last para is blank?" check
no issue
- when the page is missing the context can be undefined, this defaults it to an empty array so that later `context.includes()` calls don't error
refs #9589
* updated body_class helper to use newer code standards
* updated content helper to use newer code standards
* updated date helper to use newer code standards
no issue
- Admin API v2 returned /404/, see comment in code base:
/**
* CASE: admin api should serve preview urls
*
* @NOTE
* The url service has no clue of the draft/scheduled concept. It only generates urls for published resources.
* Adding a hardcoded fallback into the url service feels wrong IMO.
*
* Imagine the site won't be part of core and core does not serve urls anymore.
* Core needs to offer a preview API, which returns draft posts.
* That means the url is no longer /p/:uuid, it's e.g. GET /api/v2/content/preview/:uuid/.
* /p/ is a concept of the site, not of core.
*
* The site is not aware of existing drafts. It won't be able to get the uuid.
*
* Needs further discussion.
*/
no-issue
The 2.17 migration included a bug which set the `is_private`, `amp` and `force_i18n` setting values to `'false'` when they should have been `'true'`
We've reverted these changes by reading the most recent backup file, and setting the value to `'true'` if the backup has it set to `'true'` AND the current db has it set to false.
We've also amended the broken migration, so that it does not cause this issue for future installs
no-issue
Currently if you run two migrations on the same day, the backup is overwritten. This change adds the `HH-mm-ss` to the file name, meaning that you get a unique backup for each migration.
refs #10599
- meta_description output wrong meta description
Only solves meta_description for this use case:
```
routes:
/:
data: page.{slug}
template: t
```
refs #10082
```
routes:
/news/:
data: post.news
```
The twitter_image was not available, because the context is [news, post] and the data is in `data.post`.
The context helper was incorrect. I think it is still not fully correct, but only focused on this use case.
The meta layer needs a full refactoring.
refs #10593
- Added `canonical_url` field to post&pages resources in Admin & Content APIs
- Support for canonical URL on metadata layer (used in {{ghost_head}} helper)
- Made sure the new field is not accessible from API v0.1
- Added handling same domain relative and absolute URLs
refs #10582
- I don't think this is a good idea
- If a user passses "null", we should treat it as a string
- I am not aware of a use case why people have "null" in their database
- If people send "null" via the API, we should respect this and accept a string
refs #10582
- otherwise we will forward string booleans to model layer
- causes trouble if we trigger events
- causes trouble if we want to add conditions to the model e.g. setting.get('value') ?
no issue
- e.g. /feed.xml/ was showing a 422
- any other none slug site requests showed a 422
- should be a 404
- context: site is talking to Content API
- it can happen that the API returns a 422
- the routing layer needs to handle this and always show a 404
- catched error in routing error handling
- need to see if there are more cases
