Image zoom gives you complete control of the size of most images displayed in
mozilla based software. Both individual images or whole pages of images can be
zoomed.
WWW: http://imagezoom.yellowgorilla.net/
russian/xpi-imagezoom is obsolete now that www/xpi-imagezoom comes with russian
locale bundled.
PR: ports/101584
Submitted by: Alexander V. Ribchansky <triosoft@triosoft.com.ua>
- Add entry about viewcvs->viewvc
- Fix last entry. s|ports/sysutils/e17-module|sysutils/e17-module| [1]
Pointy hat to: itectu [1]
* devel/viewcvs
- Remove port
* net-mgmt/rancid
- Change to devel/viewvc in pkg-message
- Update to version 0.9.4
- Remove OpenSSL knob as the port requires it now
- Register CONFLICTS with net-im/simicq and net-im/sim-im-devel
- Update WWW
Repocopied by: marcus
and Catalyst::Devel, and Catalyst::Plugin::Static::Simple, and
Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader is no longer included in distribution.
Catalyst.pm is in the Catalyst::Runtime distribution, so p5-Catalyst will
point at p5-Catalyst-Runtime in MOVED.
- audio/py-shellac -> audio/shellac because it's application not a library. [1]
PR: ports/99165 [1]
Submitted by: Alexander Botero-Lowry <alex@foxybanana.com> [1]
Repocopy by: marcus [1]
- Update to 2.0.2 [2]
- Take maintainership [2]
PR: ports/98686 [1], ports/98732 [2]
Submitted by: Jose Alonso Cardenas Marquez <acardenas@bsd.org.pe>
Repocopied by: marcus
- Update to 0.8.1
- Enable full exif support by default
- Update COMMENT and pkg-descr
PR: ports/96821
Submitted by: sat
Approved by: krion (then mentor)
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
x11-toolkits/gtk--2-reference -> x11-toolkits/gtkmm20-reference
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
x11/gnomepanel-reference -> x11/gnome-panel-reference
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for japanese/gnomelibs, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for x11/gnome2-fifth-toe, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
x11/gnomedesktop-reference -> x11/gnome-desktop-reference
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcu
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for x11-toolkits/py-gnome2, chase the rename.
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
