* pci/yijing-ari:
PCI: shpchp: Iterate over all devices in slot, not functions 0-7
PCI: sgihp: Iterate over all devices in slot, not functions 0-7
PCI: cpcihp: Iterate over all devices in slot, not functions 0-7
PCI: pciehp: Iterate over all devices in slot, not functions 0-7
PCI: Consolidate "next-function" functions
PCI: Rename pci_enable_ari() to pci_configure_ari()
PCI: Enable ARI if dev and upstream bridge support it; disable otherwise
Iterate through devices in a slot by using the upstream bridge's
"bus->devices" list instead of assuming they are functions 0-7. It's
possible there are several slots on the same pci_bus, so restrict it to
only devices matching this slot's device number.
ARI (which allows functions 0-255) is a PCIe-only feature, and this is
a PCI hotplug driver, so we shouldn't find anything other than functions
0-7, but it's better to iterate the same way as other hotplug drivers.
[bhelgaas: changelog, check PCI_SLOT, fix shpchp_unconfigure_device()]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Iterate through devices in a slot by using the upstream bridge's
"bus->devices" list instead of assuming they are functions 0-7. It's
possible there are several slots on the same pci_bus, so restrict it to
only devices matching this slot's device number.
ARI (which allows functions 0-255) is a PCIe-only feature, and this is
a PCI hotplug driver, so we shouldn't find anything other than functions
0-7, but it's better to iterate the same way as other hotplug drivers.
[bhelgaas: changelog, check PCI_SLOT, fix disable_slot()]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Iterate through devices in a slot by using the upstream bridge's
"bus->devices" list instead of assuming they are functions 0-7. It's
possible there are several slots on the same pci_bus, so restrict it to
only devices matching this slot's device number.
ARI (which allows functions 0-255) is a PCIe-only feature, and this is
a PCI hotplug driver, so we shouldn't find anything other than functions
0-7, but it's better to iterate the same way as other hotplug drivers.
[bhelgaas: changelog, check PCI_SLOT, fix cpci_unconfigure_slot()]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Currently, we enumerate devices in a slot with pci_scan_slot(), then
iterate through all the devices we found by looking for functions 0-7. But
that's wrong for ARI devices, which may have function numbers up to 255.
This means that when we hot-add an ARI device, pciehp only initializes
functions 0-7, and other functions don't work correctly. Additionally, if
we hot-remove the device, pciehp only removes functions 0-7, leaving stale
pci_dev structures for any other functions.
This patch fixes the problem by iterating over devices in a slot by using
the upstream bridge's "bus->devices" list instead.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
There are several next_fn functions (no_next_fn, next_trad_fn,
next_ari_fn); consolidate them in next_fn() to simplify the code.
[bhelgaas: make next_fn() static, rework control flow]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
pci_enable_ari() now supports enabling or disabling ARI forwarding. So
rename pci_enable_ari() to pci_configure_ari() for easy understanding.
No functional change.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Currently, we enable ARI in a device's upstream bridge if the bridge and
the device support it. But we never disable ARI, even if the device is
removed and replaced with a device that doesn't support ARI.
This means that if we hot-remove an ARI device and replace it with a
non-ARI multi-function device, we find only function 0 of the new device
because the upstream bridge still has ARI enabled, and next_ari_fn()
only returns function 0 for the new non-ARI device.
This patch disables ARI in the upstream bridge if the device doesn't
support ARI. See the PCIe spec, r3.0, sec 6.13.
[bhelgaas: changelog, function comment]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
The ACPI handles of PCI root bridges need to be known to
acpi_bind_one(), so that it can create the appropriate
"firmware_node" and "physical_node" files for them, but currently
the way it gets to know those handles is not exactly straightforward
(to put it lightly).
This is how it works, roughly:
1. acpi_bus_scan() finds the handle of a PCI root bridge,
creates a struct acpi_device object for it and passes that
object to acpi_pci_root_add().
2. acpi_pci_root_add() creates a struct acpi_pci_root object,
populates its "device" field with its argument's address
(device->handle is the ACPI handle found in step 1).
3. The struct acpi_pci_root object created in step 2 is passed
to pci_acpi_scan_root() and used to get resources that are
passed to pci_create_root_bus().
4. pci_create_root_bus() creates a struct pci_host_bridge object
and passes its "dev" member to device_register().
5. platform_notify(), which for systems with ACPI is set to
acpi_platform_notify(), is called.
So far, so good. Now it starts to be "interesting".
6. acpi_find_bridge_device() is used to find the ACPI handle of
the given device (which is the PCI root bridge) and executes
acpi_pci_find_root_bridge(), among other things, for the
given device object.
7. acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() uses the name (sic!) of the given
device object to extract the segment and bus numbers of the PCI
root bridge and passes them to acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle().
8. acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() browses the list of ACPI PCI
root bridges and finds the one that matches the given segment
and bus numbers. Its handle is then used to initialize the
ACPI handle of the PCI root bridge's device object by
acpi_bind_one(). However, this is *exactly* the ACPI handle we
started with in step 1.
Needless to say, this is quite embarassing, but it may be avoided
thanks to commit f3fd0c8 (ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be
initialized in advance), which makes it possible to initialize the
ACPI handle of a device before passing it to device_register().
Accordingly, add a new __weak routine, pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(),
defaulting to an empty implementation that can be replaced by the
interested architecutres (x86 and ia64 at the moment) with functions
that will set the root bridge's ACPI handle before its dev member is
passed to device_register(). Make both x86 and ia64 provide such
implementations of pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() and remove
acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() and acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() that
aren't necessary any more.
Included is a fix for breakage on systems with non-ACPI PCI host
bridges from Bjorn Helgaas.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
* pci/yinghai-survey-resources+acpi-scan:
ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way
ACPI: Remove unused struct acpi_pci_root.id member
ACPI: Drop ACPI device .bind() and .unbind() callbacks
ACPI / PCI: Move the _PRT setup and cleanup code to pci-acpi.c
ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup
ACPI: Add .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks to struct acpi_bus_type
ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument
ACPI: Replace ACPI device add_type field with a match_driver flag
ACPI: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_scan()
ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used
ACPI: Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
ACPI / PCI: Fold acpi_pci_root_start() into acpi_pci_root_add()
ACPI: Change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add()
ACPI: Replace struct acpi_bus_ops with enum type
ACPI: Reduce the usage of struct acpi_bus_ops
ACPI: Make acpi_bus_add() and acpi_bus_start() visibly different
ACPI: Change the ordering of PCI root bridge driver registrarion
ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from probing ACPI drivers
* 'acpi-scan' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way
ACPI: Remove unused struct acpi_pci_root.id member
ACPI: Drop ACPI device .bind() and .unbind() callbacks
ACPI / PCI: Move the _PRT setup and cleanup code to pci-acpi.c
ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup
ACPI: Add .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks to struct acpi_bus_type
ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument
ACPI: Replace ACPI device add_type field with a match_driver flag
ACPI: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_scan()
ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used
ACPI: Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
ACPI / PCI: Fold acpi_pci_root_start() into acpi_pci_root_add()
ACPI: Change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add()
ACPI: Replace struct acpi_bus_ops with enum type
ACPI: Reduce the usage of struct acpi_bus_ops
ACPI: Make acpi_bus_add() and acpi_bus_start() visibly different
ACPI: Change the ordering of PCI root bridge driver registrarion
ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from probing ACPI drivers
Conflicts:
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
During testing remove/rescan root bus 00, found
[ 338.142574] bus: 'pci': really_probe: probing driver ata_piix with device 0000:00:01.1
[ 338.146788] ata_piix 0000:00:01.1: device not available (can't reserve [io 0x01f0-0x01f7])
[ 338.150565] ata_piix: probe of 0000:00:01.1 failed with error -22
because that fixed resource is not claimed.
For bootint path it is claimed in from
arch/x86/pci/i386.c::pcibios_allocate_resources()
Claim those resources, so on the remove/rescan will still use old
resources.
It is some kind honoring FW setting in the registers during hot add.
esp root-bus hot add is through acpi, BIOS has chance to set some registers
before handing over.
[bhelgaas: move weak definition to patch that uses it]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Firmware may have assigned PCI BARs for hot-added devices, so reserve
those resources before trying to allocate more.
[bhelgaas: move empty weak definition here]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
The PCI resource allocation functions will be used for hot-added
devices, so keep them around.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
The BIOS doesn't assign BAR values for hot-added devices, so don't
bother saving the original values when we enumerate these devices.
[bhelgaas: changelog, return constant 0 in pcibios_retrieve_fw_addr]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Factor pcibios_allocate_rom_resources() and
pcibios_allocate_dev_rom_resource() out of pcibios_assign_resources().
This will allow us to allocate ROM resources for hot-added root buses.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Previously pcibios_allocate_resources() allocated resources at boot-time
for all PCI devices using for_each_pci_dev(). This patch changes
pcibios_allocate_resources() so we can specify a bus, so we can do
similar allocation when hot-adding a root bus.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Factor pcibios_allocate_dev_resources() out of
pcibios_allocate_resources(). Currently we only allocate these
resources at boot-time with a for_each_pci_dev() loop. Eventually
we'll use pcibios_allocate_dev_resources() for hot-added devices, too.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Commit 805d410 (ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from
probing ACPI drivers) introduced an ACPI power resources management
regression, because it didn't ensure that the power resources
driver bind to the struct acpi_device objects corresponding
to power resources as soon as they were created. As a result,
ACPI power management routines may attempt to access power resource
objects before they are ready to use.
To fix this problem, tell the acpi_add_single_object() in
acpi_bus_check_add() to probe the driver for objects of type
ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER. This fix has been verified to work on
HP nx6325 where the problem was first observed.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Thus pcibios_allocate_bus_resources() could more simple and clean.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
__pci_enable_device_flags() takes values like IORESOURCE_IO and
IORESOURCE_MEM, which are values for struct resource.flags, which is
"unsigned long", not "resource_size_t".
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
This member is never initialized and never referenced, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Drop the .bind() and .unbind() that have no more users from
struct acpi_device_ops and remove all of the code referring to
them from drivers/acpi/scan.c.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Move the code related to _PRT setup and removal and to power
resources from acpi_pci_bind() and acpi_pci_unbind() to the .setup()
and .cleanup() callbacks in acpi_pci_bus and remove acpi_pci_bind()
and acpi_pci_unbind() that have no purpose any more. Accordingly,
remove the code related to device .bind() and .unbind() operations
from the ACPI PCI root bridge driver.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Currently, the ACPI wakeup capability of PCI devices is set up
in two different places, partially in acpi_pci_bind() where
runtime wakeup is initialized and partially in
platform_pci_wakeup_init(), where system wakeup is initialized.
The cleanup is only done in acpi_pci_unbind() and it only covers
runtime wakeup.
Use the new .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks in struct acpi_bus_type
to consolidate that code and do the setup and the cleanup each in one
place.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Add two new callbacks,.setup() and .cleanup(), struct acpi_bus_type
and modify acpi_platform_notify() to call .setup() after executing
acpi_bind_one() successfully and acpi_platform_notify_remove() to
call .cleanup() before running acpi_unbind_one(). This will allow
the users of struct acpi_bus_type, PCI in particular, to specify
operations to be executed right after the given device has been
associated with a companion struct acpi_device and right before
it's going to be detached from that companion, respectively.
The main motivation is to be able to get rid of acpi_pci_bind()
and acpi_pci_unbind(), which are horrible horrible stuff. [In short,
there are three problems with them: The way they populate the .bind()
and .unbind() callbacks of ACPI devices is rather less than
straightforward, they require special hotplug-specific paths to be
present in the ACPI namespace scanning code and by the time
acpi_pci_unbind() is called the PCI device object in question may
not exist any more.]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has
succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to
the handle passed as the first argument. Unfortunately, however,
this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add()
too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct
acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to
one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that
handle).
For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about
whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for
its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device()
anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really
useful for them. The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan()
executed directly from acpi_scan_init().
Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the
existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of
acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second
argument of acpi_bus_add(). Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to
use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer
needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
After the removal of the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() there is
no difference between the ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH and ACPI_BUS_ADD_START
add types, so the add_type field in struct acpi_device may be
replaced with a single flag. Do that calling the flag match_driver.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
After the removal of acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() is not necessary any more,
so drop it and update acpi_bus_check_add() accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and
redefine its header to match the body. Update all of its callers as
necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed
lines of code (Linus will like that).
Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how
its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make
note to self to take care of that later).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
The ACPI PCI root bridge driver was the only ACPI driver implementing
the .start() callback, which isn't used by any ACPI drivers any more
now.
For this reason, acpi_start_single_object() has no purpose any more,
so remove it and all references to it. Also remove
acpi_bus_start_device(), whose only purpose was to call
acpi_start_single_object().
Moreover, since after the removal of acpi_bus_start_device() the
only purpose of acpi_bus_start() remains to call
acpi_update_all_gpes(), move that into acpi_bus_add() and drop
acpi_bus_start() too, remove its header from acpi_bus.h and
update all of its former users accordingly.
This change was previously proposed in a different from by
Yinghai Lu.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Move the code from the ACPI PCI root bridge's .start() callback
routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), directly into acpi_pci_root_add()
and drop acpi_pci_root_start().
It is safe to do that, because it is now always guaranteed that
when struct pci_dev objects are created, their companion struct
acpi_device objects are already present, so it is not necessary to
wait for them to be created before calling pci_bus_add_devices().
This change was previously proposed in a different form by
Yinghai Lu.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
If acpi_bus_check_add() is called for a handle already having an
existing struct acpi_device object attached, it is not necessary to
check the type and status of the device correspondig to it, so
change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add() to avoid that.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Notice that one member of struct acpi_bus_ops, acpi_op_add, is not
used anywhere any more and the relationship between its remaining
members, acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start, is such that it doesn't
make sense to set the latter without setting the former at the same
time. Therefore, replace struct acpi_bus_ops with new a enum type,
enum acpi_bus_add_type, with three values, ACPI_BUS_ADD_BASIC,
ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH, ACPI_BUS_ADD_START, corresponding to
both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start unset, acpi_op_match set and
acpi_op_start unset, and both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start set,
respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Objects of type struct acpi_bus_ops are currently used to pass
information between different parts of the ACPI namespace scanning
code, sometimes in quite convoluted ways. It turns out that that
is not necessary in some cases, so simplify the code by reducing
the utilization of struct acpi_bus_ops objects where clearly
possible.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
The current ACPI namespace scanning code suggests that acpi_bus_add()
and acpi_bus_start() share some code. In fact, however, they are
completely different code paths (except for the initial checks), so
refactor the code to make that distinction visibly clear.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Instead of running acpi_pci_root_init() from a separate subsys
initcall, call it directly from acpi_scan_init() before scanning the
ACPI namespace for the first time, so that the PCI root bridge
driver's .add() routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), is always run
before binding ACPI drivers or attaching "companion" device objects
to struct acpi_device objects below the root bridge's device node in
the ACPI namespace.
The first, simpler reason for doing this is that it makes the
situation during boot more similar to the situation during hotplug,
in which the ACPI PCI root bridge driver is always present.
The second reason is that acpi_pci_root_init() causes struct pci_dev
objects to be created for all PCI devices below the bridge and
these objects may be necessary for whatever is done with the other
ACPI device nodes in that namespace scope. For example, devices
created by acpi_create_platform_device() sometimes may need to be
added to the device hierarchy as children of PCI bridges. For this
purpose, however, the struct pci_dev objects representing those
bridges need to exist before the platform devices in question are
registered.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Split the ACPI namespace scanning for devices into two passes, such
that struct acpi_device objects are registerd in the first pass
without probing ACPI drivers and the drivers are probed against them
directly in the second pass.
There are two main reasons for doing that.
First, the ACPI PCI root bridge driver's .add() routine,
acpi_pci_root_add(), causes struct pci_dev objects to be created for
all PCI devices under the given root bridge. Usually, there are
corresponding ACPI device nodes in the ACPI namespace for some of
those devices and therefore there should be "companion" struct
acpi_device objects to attach those struct pci_dev objects to. These
struct acpi_device objects should exist when the corresponding
struct pci_dev objects are created, but that is only guaranteed
during boot and not during hotplug. This leads to a number of
functional differences between the boot and the hotplug cases which
are not strictly necessary and make the code more complicated.
For example, this forces the ACPI PCI root bridge driver to defer the
registration of the just created struct pci_dev objects and to use a
special .start() callback routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), to make
sure that all of the "companion" struct acpi_device objects will be
present at PCI devices registration time during hotplug.
If those differences can be eliminated, we will be able to
consolidate the boot and hotplug code paths for the enumeration and
registration of PCI devices and to reduce the complexity of that
code quite a bit.
The second reason is that, in general, it should be possible to
resolve conflicts of resources assigned by the BIOS to different
devices represented by ACPI namespace nodes before any drivers bind
to them and before they are attached to "companion" objects
representing physical devices (such as struct pci_dev). However, for
this purpose we first need to enumerate all ACPI device nodes in the
given namespace scope.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Pull LED fix from Bryan Wu.
* 'fixes-for-3.8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/linux-leds:
leds: leds-gpio: set devm_gpio_request_one() flags param correctly
commit a99d76f leds: leds-gpio: use gpio_request_one
changed the leds-gpio driver to use gpio_request_one() instead
of gpio_request() + gpio_direction_output()
Unfortunately, it also made a semantic change that breaks the
leds-gpio driver.
The gpio_request_one() flags parameter was set to:
GPIOF_DIR_OUT | (led_dat->active_low ^ state)
Since GPIOF_DIR_OUT is 0, the final flags value will just be the
XOR'ed value of led_dat->active_low and state.
This value were used to distinguish between HIGH/LOW output initial
level and call gpio_direction_output() accordingly.
With this new semantic gpio_request_one() will take the flags value
of 1 as a configuration of input direction (GPIOF_DIR_IN) and will
call gpio_direction_input() instead of gpio_direction_output().
int gpio_request_one(unsigned gpio, unsigned long flags, const char *label)
{
..
if (flags & GPIOF_DIR_IN)
err = gpio_direction_input(gpio);
else
err = gpio_direction_output(gpio,
(flags & GPIOF_INIT_HIGH) ? 1 : 0);
..
}
The right semantic is to evaluate led_dat->active_low ^ state and
set the output initial level explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Reported-by: Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org>
Tested-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>
Pull watchdog fixes from Wim Van Sebroeck:
"This fixes some small errors in the new da9055 driver, eliminates a
compiler warning and adds DT support for the twl4030_wdt driver (so
that we can have multiple watchdogs with DT on the omap platforms)."
* git://www.linux-watchdog.org/linux-watchdog:
watchdog: twl4030_wdt: add DT support
watchdog: omap_wdt: eliminate unused variable and a compiler warning
watchdog: da9055: Don't update wdt_dev->timeout in da9055_wdt_set_timeout error path
watchdog: da9055: Fix invalid free of devm_ allocated data
