can't be disabled by setting it to "no" like the other variables.
Besides, flavor/pkg/metadata.mk has been expecting for a long time that "no"
is a valid value.
Make PKG_DEVELOPER DWIM.
Use eggs instead of distutils.
Remove patch-aa as it no longer applies.
Add licenses/zpl and add zpl to mk/license.mk:DEFAULT_ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES.
Patch posted to pkgsrc-users@ and okayed by agc@.
sources, and add a comment opining that there should be only a single
place to configure the default and per-machine lists for both source
and binary package building/installation.
remove comment about '#LICENSE=' lines because license.mk is not
live
rephrase comment saying that we will likely add licenses not
formally Free or Open source to the default list if they are
obviously approvable, but we'll note this with comments
The following licenses are accepted by default:
public-domain
gnu-gpl-v2 gnu-lgpl-v2
gnu-gpl-v3 gnu-lgpl-v3
original-bsd modified-bsd
x11
apache-2.0
cddl-1.0
open-font-license
All packages should now be converted to define their LICENSE.
Show a warning when PKG_DEVELOPER is set but LICENSE is not defined.
Use lower case to be consistent with existing license names.
Declare that free/open licenses do not have -license at the end.
Better articulate rationale for default choice.
Add x11 license (also called mit).
Note 'wait and see' stance towards gnu-gpl-v3.
accepting the license"; that sounds too close to a contract issue.
Pkgsrc's license framework is merely about not building a package with
a license not on the ok list by accident, and is not intended to have
any contractual effects.
Split comment about 'package user" into separate concepts of
installing binary packages and running programs in packages.
Add XXX about how DEFAULT_ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES relates to the initial
value of ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES.
