* marking up device names to distinguish from surrounding text

* refactoring last paragraph or so to clarify implicit use of rescue volume
This commit is contained in:
Joe 2018-03-06 08:20:39 -05:00
parent 0cec9f1214
commit 4803d5ed3e
1 changed files with 12 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
OK, backing out of earlier suggestion, which was based on a misunderstanding OK, backing out of earlier suggestion, which was based on a misunderstanding
of the document in question: of the document in question:
@ -8,16 +6,16 @@ of the document in question:
The problem occurs if the reader loses track of the roles of the disk images The problem occurs if the reader loses track of the roles of the disk images
through the process. In **Rescue Mode**, a pile of bits goes into a volume through the process. In **Rescue Mode**, a pile of bits goes into a volume
known temporarily as /dev/sda. known temporarily as ```/dev/sda```.
Then, booting into the **Installer profile**, that pile of bits gets a Then, booting into the **Installer profile**, that pile of bits gets a
different name, /dev/sdb. Those bits are used to boot, but only different name, ```/dev/sdb```. Those bits are used to boot, but only
temporarily, during installation. Unlike in **Rescue mode**, the name temporarily, during installation. Unlike in **Rescue mode**, the name
/dev/sda is applied to a different volume, a volume intended to receive the ```/dev/sda``` is applied to a different volume, a volume intended to receive the
installed system and eventually to become the boot volume. installed system and eventually to become the boot volume.
Finally, in the **Boot profile**, that pile of bits, still under the name Finally, in the **Boot profile**, that pile of bits, still under the name
/dev/sda, is used to boot the system. ```/dev/sda```, is used to boot the system.
At this point, I think I'll suggest changing the language so that the two At this point, I think I'll suggest changing the language so that the two
profiles do not have the same names as the two disk images. Use of the term profiles do not have the same names as the two disk images. Use of the term
@ -48,9 +46,12 @@ In the **Production** profile, one boots from the **target** image, and the **in
The process optionally can stop here, or continue into the improvements The process optionally can stop here, or continue into the improvements
suggested by the rest of the document. suggested by the rest of the document.
Again, the installation necessarily entails 3 boots--into **Rescue Mode**,
into the **Installer** profile, and into the **Boot** profile
It is easier to miss the switch in the role of the disk names and volume It is easier to miss the switch in the role of the disk names and volume
roles because, even though the installation necessarily entails 3 roles through this process because this document visually draws out the two
boots--into **Rescue Mode**, into the **Installer** profile, and into the profiles **Installer** and **Boot**. In contrast, it somewhat buries the
**Boot** profile--this document visually draws out the two profiles implicit aspects of the existing volume from which the system is booted into
**Installer** and **Boot** but in contrast somewhat buries the implicit **Rescue Mode**.
aspects of the volume used to boot in **Rescue Mode**.